There is no official GameFAQs app, and we do not support nor have any contact with the makers of these unofficial apps. Continued use of these apps may cause your IP to be blocked indefinitely. This triggers our anti-spambot measures, which are designed to stop automated systems from flooding the site with traffic. Some unofficial phone apps appear to be using GameFAQs as a back-end, but they do not behave like a real web browser does.Using GameFAQs regularly with these browsers can cause temporary and even permanent IP blocks due to these additional requests. If you are using Maxthon or Brave as a browser, or have installed the Ghostery add-on, you should know that these programs send extra traffic to our servers for every page on the site that you browse.The most common causes of this issue are: Our Instant Poll this week asks, "Do you use search engines to look for vulnerabilities in the Web sites you manage?" Visit and give us your answer.Your IP address has been temporarily blocked due to a large number of HTTP requests. I'm not sure whether the update process totally overwrites the signature file or not you might want to save a copy of your custom signatures in case it does. If you do, be aware that the tool also has an update feature that lets you download new queries from the Foundstone Web site when they're available. The signatures are stored in XML format, so you can add more or customize the current rules if you need to. After the query is complete, you can easily export a report to HTML format. Site Digger has a list of more than 100 predefined queries (vulnerability signatures) in which you simply enter a Web site address and click a button to start the Google query process. I've used SiteDigger a few times, and it works really well. Foundstone released a free tool in May that automates the process of using Google to scan for vulnerabilities in a given site. One obvious solution is to use scripts to store queries and automate the actual querying and result gathering process. You can also build false URLs into a honeypot that supports Web services, then add the honeypot URLs to various search engines.Ī drawback of using search engines to search for vulnerabilities on your Web sites is that typing or pasting in query after query can become tedious work. Think of it as another method for scanning your systems. Repeating the searches when new Web-related vulnerabilities are published might also be wise. If intruders are using search engines, you should try the same techniques to check your own Web sites for vulnerabilities. MSN Search, AlltheWeb, Yahoo!, and others support a similar syntax to varying degrees. Google isn't the only search engine that provides the use of this sort of query syntax. For example, Google supports query syntax that includes the commands intitle:, inurl:, allinurl:, filetype:, intext:, and more. The paper outlines several ways in which someone can use a particular search syntax in Google to query for sites that might have known vulnerabilities. In the past week, the site has published a few new papers, one of which is "Demystifying Google Hacks," by Debasis Mohanty. Last week, I mentioned the Information Security Writers Web site, which publishes security papers written by many authors. If you have a tip, tidbit of information, resource, commentary, or other content that you think might be of interest to others, then certainly send me an email (mark at ntsecurity / net) with that content and I'll consider posting it to the blog. You can visit the Security Matters blog to add your comments to a given posting. Each week in this newsletter, you'll find a summary of the most recent blog postings. If you visit the Web site regularly and subscribe to our security-related Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feed, then you know we recently launched a new blog: Security Matters. First, I want to let you know that we've added a new section to our Web site and this newsletter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |